Skip to Main Content

Middle School Science: Ethics in Science

Resources for MYP/DP Science

Remember POWER Databases!

Evolution of Science

hy*poth*e*sisnoun\hī-ˈpäth-ə-səs\
something not proved but assumed to be true for purposes of argument or further study or investigation
 
the*o*rynoun\ˈthē-ə-rē, ˈthi(-ə)r-ē\
1 : the general ideas or principles of an art or science <music theory>
2 : a general principle or set of principles that explains facts or events of the natural world <wave theory of light>
3 : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action <her method is based on the theory that all dogs can be trained>
b : an ideal set of facts, principles, or circumstances often used in the phrase in theory<in theory, everyone can receive a score of 100 on the test>
4 : an idea that is the starting point for argument or investigation <the theory of relativity>
 
lawnoun\ˈlȯ\
1 a : a rule of conduct or action laid down and enforced by the supreme governing authority (as the legislature) of a community or established by custom
b : the whole collection of such rules <the law of the land>
c : the control brought about by enforcing rules <forces of law and order>
d : trial in a court to decide what is just and right according to the laws <go to law>
e : an agent or agency for enforcing laws
2 : the first part of the Jewish scriptures compare hagiographaprophets
3 : a basic rule or principle <the laws of poetry>
4 a : the profession of a lawyer
b : the branch of knowledge that deals with laws and their interpretation and application <study law>
5 : a rule or principle stating something that always works in the same way under the same conditions <the law of gravity>

Skeptical Science Websites

Habits of Mind

Peer Review, from BrainPop:

One of the most important concepts behind the scientific method is that experiments must be repeatable by others. So when scientists publish the results of their experiments, those results go through a very thorough process called peer review

In peer review, other scientists read and evaluate an experiment, making sure that the original researcher(s) followed all the steps of the scientific method. They also check to make sure that there are no lapses in logic between the experiment’s hypothesis and conclusion. 

Peer review is important not only because it ensures that experiments are carried out correctly; it also acts as a stamp of approval from others—including competitors—working in a particular field. 

Peer review is therefore considered an extremely critical part of the scientific establishment. In fact, if an experiment is published by an individual or organization that does not peer review its articles, the results of the experiment are usually considered suspect by members of the scientific community.

From BrainPop:
Language

Logical fallacies are tricky because they're so hard to spot. An argument with a fallacy often seems to make complete sense, when in reality its logic is deeply flawed!

Here are just a few common fallacies that you should learn to avoid:

Non sequitur: Latin for "it does not follow," a non sequitur argument has a claim that does not necessarily follow from the reason(s) given.
Ex. "If you don't ride a bicycle, you don't care about the environment."

Argument from ignorance: When something is claimed to be true because there is no evidence to disprove it. An effective argument must be based on evidence that exists, not evidence that does not exist.
Ex. "There is no proof that aliens haven't visited Earth. Therefore, aliens must have visited Earth."

Appeal to the people: This fallacy argues that a claim must be true because a lot of people believe it. The popularity of an idea has nothing to do with its truth.
Ex. "So many people have reported near-death experiences that they must be something more than hallucinations."

Argument from authority: This type of appeal depends upon the title or position of the arguer, rather than on the merits of any evidence given in support of the argument. The arguer could be an authority figure, an expert in either a relevant or irrelevant field, or someone with a special relationship to the listener, like a friend. Regardless of who's making an argument, it must be backed by solid proof. Expertise is not a replacement for evidence.
Ex: "My aunt is a teacher, and she said that's not a good school, so it must not be."

Ethics in Science

Researсh Ethics: History & Principles

Videos to Watch

Case Studies

Related Guides